<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Automating CSS 3 Gradients</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stubbornella.org/content/2011/04/25/css-3-gradients/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stubbornella.org/content/2011/04/25/css-3-gradients/</link>
	<description>A Term of Endearment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 17:31:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Carper</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornella.org/content/2011/04/25/css-3-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-19757</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Carper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornella.org/content/?p=771#comment-19757</guid>
		<description>This is a very cool tool -- nice work..

And @Stephanie I will be forcing that upon my designer ;)

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very cool tool &#8212; nice work..</p>
<p>And @Stephanie I will be forcing that upon my designer <img src='http://www.stubbornella.org/content/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie Rewis</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornella.org/content/2011/04/25/css-3-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-19699</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Rewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornella.org/content/?p=771#comment-19699</guid>
		<description>Awesome work!! 

For those of you that need radial gradients—if you have Illustrator you can add the Illustrator HTML5 pack (available on labs.adobe.com but you may have to search for it). Then you can export the gradient code directly from Illy (radial and linear).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome work!! </p>
<p>For those of you that need radial gradients—if you have Illustrator you can add the Illustrator HTML5 pack (available on labs.adobe.com but you may have to search for it). Then you can export the gradient code directly from Illy (radial and linear).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Boutin</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornella.org/content/2011/04/25/css-3-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-19679</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Boutin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornella.org/content/?p=771#comment-19679</guid>
		<description>Anyone know if there is a radial gradient css generator out there? All of theses tools work great for linear gradients. I need one for radial.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know if there is a radial gradient css generator out there? All of theses tools work great for linear gradients. I need one for radial.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanislav</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornella.org/content/2011/04/25/css-3-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-19668</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanislav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornella.org/content/?p=771#comment-19668</guid>
		<description>Hey, i&#039;ve build a browser based tool. This one has also some limitations and the export is not quite good tested at the moment. But it&#039;s on github and open for collaboration :D

Here is the link: https://github.com/lifedraft/image_to_css_gradient 

PS: You have to download it and open it locally with safari to get it working

Best,
Stanislav</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, i&#8217;ve build a browser based tool. This one has also some limitations and the export is not quite good tested at the moment. But it&#8217;s on github and open for collaboration <img src='http://www.stubbornella.org/content/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Here is the link: <a href="https://github.com/lifedraft/image_to_css_gradient" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/lifedraft/image_to_css_gradient</a> </p>
<p>PS: You have to download it and open it locally with safari to get it working</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Stanislav</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ionut popa</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornella.org/content/2011/04/25/css-3-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-19660</link>
		<dc:creator>ionut popa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornella.org/content/?p=771#comment-19660</guid>
		<description>Hi Nicole,
This one is a pretty recent tool seems quite useful for getting the gradient out of an image http://gradient-scanner.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nicole,<br />
This one is a pretty recent tool seems quite useful for getting the gradient out of an image <a href="http://gradient-scanner.com/" rel="nofollow">http://gradient-scanner.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Degradados CSS3 &#124; ceslava - Diseño y Formación</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornella.org/content/2011/04/25/css-3-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-19635</link>
		<dc:creator>Degradados CSS3 &#124; ceslava - Diseño y Formación</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornella.org/content/?p=771#comment-19635</guid>
		<description>[...] Hasta ahora los diseñadores utilizábamos herramientas como Photoshop o Fireworks para crear las imágenes que reproducen estos degradados al ponerlas repetidas veces como fondo. Nicole planteaba en su Twitter si no era posible generar ese código del degradado CSS3 desde una imagen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hasta ahora los diseñadores utilizábamos herramientas como Photoshop o Fireworks para crear las imágenes que reproducen estos degradados al ponerlas repetidas veces como fondo. Nicole planteaba en su Twitter si no era posible generar ese código del degradado CSS3 desde una imagen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Vazquez</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornella.org/content/2011/04/25/css-3-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-19633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Vazquez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornella.org/content/?p=771#comment-19633</guid>
		<description>Great! This will be a soooo helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! This will be a soooo helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornella.org/content/2011/04/25/css-3-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-19617</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 03:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornella.org/content/?p=771#comment-19617</guid>
		<description>@Marco: Safari has its own gradient syntax which isn&#039;t quite compatible with the standard that all the other browsers support.  This is largely due to the fact that they were pioneers in the gradient field.  They invented a syntax that unfortunately wasn&#039;t accepted as the standard (and in this case I think the standard turned out right), but for backwards compatibility reasons, they can&#039;t just drop their version.

Note that WebKit has had the current syntax for several months now, so I suppose it shouldn&#039;t be too long for Safari to import it... it might just be a matter of figuring out how to support both for some time at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marco: Safari has its own gradient syntax which isn&#8217;t quite compatible with the standard that all the other browsers support.  This is largely due to the fact that they were pioneers in the gradient field.  They invented a syntax that unfortunately wasn&#8217;t accepted as the standard (and in this case I think the standard turned out right), but for backwards compatibility reasons, they can&#8217;t just drop their version.</p>
<p>Note that WebKit has had the current syntax for several months now, so I suppose it shouldn&#8217;t be too long for Safari to import it&#8230; it might just be a matter of figuring out how to support both for some time at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Steffens</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornella.org/content/2011/04/25/css-3-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-19603</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Steffens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornella.org/content/?p=771#comment-19603</guid>
		<description>Wonderfull! Last week I too was converting images to gradients and got a bit miffed by the lack of pixel support in Safari. It let me to suggest to the Modernizr team to drop support for the old webkit syntax (which is not part of the current w3c draft) in their cssgradient test since that gives a false positive when using pixels on Safari.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderfull! Last week I too was converting images to gradients and got a bit miffed by the lack of pixel support in Safari. It let me to suggest to the Modernizr team to drop support for the old webkit syntax (which is not part of the current w3c draft) in their cssgradient test since that gives a false positive when using pixels on Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornella.org/content/2011/04/25/css-3-gradients/comment-page-1/#comment-19583</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornella.org/content/?p=771#comment-19583</guid>
		<description>It would be better if Adobe had anticipated this to begin with and built the functionality directly into Photoshop!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be better if Adobe had anticipated this to begin with and built the functionality directly into Photoshop!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.stubbornella.org @ 2012-05-16 18:51:32 by W3 Total Cache -->
